SELF-EFFICACY: THE EXERCISE OF CONTROL
Albert Bandura
An outline composed by Gio Valiante
Emory University
CHAPTER 9 - ATHLETIC FUNCTIONING
Success in athletic competition requires more than physical skills.
- Cognitive factors play an influential role in athletic development and
functioning
- Belief in athletic efficacy determines who chooses to pursue athletic
activities
- The execute skills athletes must exercise control over
- Acute stressors
- Vexing pain
- Discouraging slumps
Cognitive Phase of Skill Development (371)
- Cognitive representation in the first of athletic skills developed
- Modeling
- The most effective way of transmitting information about a skill is
through proficient modeling
- Observing models perform allows individuals to gain knowledge
about the dynamic structure skills being acquired
- In viewing modeled skill, attention must be paid and symbolisms
must be formed
- Fixed skills - predictable situations - diving, golf, darts
- Generative skills - unpredictable elements - basketball, football
- Information for skill development can be modeled by
- Pictures
- Demonstrations
- Verbal instructions
- Computers and tv are helpful modeling tools
- Allow athletes to follow their own enactments
- High speed cameras capture what the eye misses
- Self-modeling is a great way to learn to perfect athletic skills
- Performances are captured on film
- Film is edited and flaws are cut out
- Raises efficacy as well as skill
Making the Unobservable Informatively Observable (373)
- A common problem in mastering athletic skills is that performers cannot fully
observe their own behavior
- Swimmers and golfers
- Thus they may practice faulty habits
- Video feedback holds the solutions
- The automation of complex skills involves atleast three (3) major processes
- Mergerization - segments of skills are merged into larger skills until it
becomes fully integrated
- Production of Contextual linkages - actions are linked to recurrent contexts
- Shift in attention from execution of action to its correllational results - focus
on the target, not the mechanics
Cognitive Enactment (visualization)
- Visualization is a cognitive skill that must be developed
- Individuals must mot be told just to visualize with no guidance
- Good visualizers profit more from cognitive enactment
- Executional success is a matter of self-belief as well as skill
- There are many constraints on when one can practice physically, but skilled performances can be visualized repeatedly with no sweat at any time and place
- Cognitive stimulation diverts attention from disruptive thoughts in stressful, competitive situations
- Visualizing positive outcomes raises efficacy which in turn boosts performance
- There are many facets of athletic skills that can be the focus of attention
- Cognitive
- Motor - regulation of action patterns and accompanying sensations
- Emotive - stress management and reduction of tension
Impact of Model Attributes on Self-Efficacy and Performance (379)
- The impact of athletic models
- Assumed similarity carries a heavy weight
- Women are especially inclined to act on their belief if the models voice
belief in themselves
- Of special interest is power of a presumably superior athlete to undermine
the efficacy beliefs of uncertain people
- Given a choice individuals are likely to select models with similar attributes
and ignore those with whom they have little in common
- Results clearly show the strength of self-modeling proficiency
Self-efficacy's Contribution to Acquisition of Motor Skills (380)
- Most people regard athletic skills as depending on innate endowment
- Aptitude is converted to mastery through effort
- Ought not view physical ability as an inherent aptitude
- Efficacy differs from confidence
- Confidence is a non descriptive term that refers to strength of belief
- Perceived self-efficacy is given powers of attainment
- The field of sports psychology is heavily invented in personality trait measures
- They do not have predictive power
- They provide little guidance for how to structure training
- Efficacy beliefs and goals were more predictive of athletic functioning than
was "competitiveness"
Self-Regulation of Athletic Performance (383)
Cognitive Aspects of Athletic Ability
- A common mistake is to judge ability by physical skills alone
- Perceived self-efficacy emerges as the sole determinant of overtime
performance
- Athletic performance is co-determined
- "Can he win when he doesn't have his good stuff?"
- A capability is only as good as its execution
- Level of perceived self-efficacy is the one psychological factor that most
consistently differentiates successful from less successful athletes across a variety
of sports
- Raising efficacy beliefs : competitors outperformed opponents
- Beliefs in efficacy contribute to resilience against the adverse effects of
defeat
- In some, mere sight of a formidable opponent instills lower efficacy beliefs
- Athletes of comparable abilities but differing self-assurance do not perform
at the same level
Efficacy Beliefs in Performance Regulation by Goal Challenges (386)
- Personal challenges through goal setting contribute to athletic skill
- String motivators
- Combine proximal with distal goals
- Self-respect operates as a powerful motivator
- The higher the self set goal, the better the performance
- In accord with goal theory, performance attainments are better predicted by
personal goals than by assigned ones
- The form that goals take affect motivation
- Poor goals are
- Vague
- Distant or remote
- Easy to fulfill
- Goals without feedback
- Better goals are
- Set high
- Include achievable sub goals
- Feedback allows foe adjustments
- Goals + efficacy to reach them = performance
Perceived Efficacy in Management of Competitive Stress and High Risks (388)
- Relation between anxiety and impaired performance
- In social cognitive theory, anxiety and impaired performances are coeffects of a low sense of efficacy to meet competitive demands
- In basketball, efficacy accounted for 40% of anxiety
- A common assumption in sports psychology is that anxiety arousal debilitates performance. "Whatever effects physiological arousal might have are likely to depend more on
- How much attention is paid to it
- Whether it is interpreted as being psyched up or distressed
- To the extent that perceived arousal affects performance, it does so through the influence of efficacy belief
Thought Control Efficacy in Managing Stressors, Failures, and Slumps (391)
- Consummate athletes have a remarkable efficacy to block out distractions and control disruptive, negative thinking
- "I don't worry about who's on base, who's at bat . . . I just concentrate on the next pitch"
- "It is me and the shot."
- Athletes must develop the efficacy to cope with failure because it is visited upon them unmercifully often (391)
- A lot of stress is self-inflicted
- Dwelling on failures rather than savoring successes
- All athletes make mistakes
- People can better rid themselves of disruptive thinking by concentrating
their attention on the task at hand
- In athletes, weak efficacy heightens vulnerability to adversity
- Get down on themselves
- Brood over mistakes
- Conjure up disastrous mistakes
- Inefficacy feeds on itself
- Efficacious athletes do not exacerbate performances problems by disruptive
emotional patterns and disruptive thought patterns
- Cognitive restructuring help "one shot at a time"
- Relax performance standards - more things are viewed as successes
- Good old fashioned "short rest" and break from the game
- Conquering a slum is not entirely an individual matter
Self-Management of Pain and Recovery from Injury (393)
- Athletes do not come equipped with fewer pain receptors than non athletes
- They must learn to play through pain and fatigue
- The belief that pain is controllable makes it so
- Efficacy beliefs aid in recovering from injury
Self-Efficacy enhancement of Athletic Performance (394)
- Past Performances
- Performance is not a cause of performance
- Different occasions mean different determinants, including
- Perceived self-efficacy
- Goal aspirations
- expected outcomes
- Perceived constraints
- Under some conditions, prior performance is an inflated predictor of itself
- When non ability factor is extracted in Multivariate analysis
- routine is performed repeatedly in isolation
Efficacy Belief in Transcendent Attainments (396)
- Analysis of breaking records
- Regardless of athletic activity, immediately after a barrier is broken, it is rapidly surpassed by others
- Once extraordinary performances are shown to be attainable, they become commonplace
- Records are not broken in uniform gradations, but in step like triumphs (chunks)
Coaching Influences on Development and Maintenance of Self-Efficacy (397)
- Coaches may differ in style, but they all have remarkable efficacy in their abilities
to motivate and teach
- They get their players to believe in themselves
- This is achieved not through rambling pep talks, but through careful
mastery experiences
- They model confidence
- They provide corrective feedback
- They place players in game situations and have them execute plays that
have a good chance of success
- Work them gradually into pressure situations
- Removing athletes prematurely undermines their efficacy
- What counts is not the failure or the difficulty, but how it is construed and
framed by the coach
Collective Efficacy and System Interdependence (403)
- A highly gifted player can raise team efficacy
- A weak link can lower team efficacy
- The whole of a team is much greater than the sum of its parts
- Players often judge team efficacy higher than individual player ability
- A collection of superstars often fails to produce a championship team
Preparatory Efficacy versus Performance Efficacy (405)
- Momentum
- Occurs when perceived self-efficacy and performance build on each other in an upward cycle
- Is governed by changes in perceived competitive efficacy, immediate strategies and microgoals for gaining control, self-evaluative reactions, and concerns over likely outcomes
Warning! Chapters are still under construction.
Back to
Self-Efficacy Page